A husband and wife were going through a rather bitter divorce. Wife called the police and said that husband beat her up. He denied the allegation; but, receiving such an accusation, the police arrested husband. So, wife automatically got the house because once a person is accused of domestic violence the accused has to move away. Naturally, husband wanted a trial. David Carter took that case to trial and pointed out all the many inconsistencies in the wife’s different stories about how this supposedly happened. The prosecutor argued that the differences were only about the details and so that shouldn’t matter. Mr. Carter pointed out that whether and how husband hit wife is the crime he is accused of, not a mere detail. The jury returned a verdict recognizing wife’s motives to lie and the fact that every interview she gave (including during Mr. Carter’s cross examination of her) resulted in a new set of alleged facts.