Ms. Cin’s client was accused of DUII. The prosecutor’s evidence was that Ms. Cin’s client had a blood alcohol level of 0.78 and was clearly affected by the alcohol due to his slurred speech and poor performance on the field sobriety tests. Unfortunately for the prosecutor’s case, the body cam video showed that Ms. Cin’s client was not slurring his speech and that he passed the field sobriety tests. Once Ms. Cin showed all the body cam video to the jury - and reminded the prosecutor that 0.78 is less than 0.8 - the jury found Ms. Cin’s client Not Guilty.