Mr. Walsh’s client was accused of a domestic violence Assault 4 and Harassment. If he were to be convicted of both charges, Mr. Walsh’s client would face up to one day less than a year and a half in jail. At trial, Mr. Walsh’s theme was that the police had a preexisting narrative that led them to automatically arrest Mr. Walsh’s client and not the woman accusing him. Towards that argument, Mr. Walsh entered into evidence photos showing that his client had multiple bite marks on his body. During cross examination of the accuser Mr. Walsh confronted her with the fact that Mr. Walsh’s client had only hit her to get her off him and to stop her biting him. Mr. Walsh’s summation at closing argument was that we don’t entirely know who was the aggressor and therefore guilt beyond a reasonable doubt was never established. Accordingly, Mr. Walsh’s client was found Not Guilty of both charges.