Mr. Walsh’s client was accused of Class A Harassment (this is the form of Harassment that carries up to 364 days of jail if convicted). The entire trial revolved around Mr. Walsh’s cross examination of the alleged victim. During that cross examination, the alleged victim conceded that she was extremely intoxicated during the event, that her memory was therefore suspect, and that Mr. Walsh’s client had not actually ‘harassed’ her through his actions. At the conclusion of the prosecutor’s evidence, Mr. Walsh made a Motion for Judgement of Acquittal based upon that cross examination. This type of motion is an argument to the judge that the prosecution’s evidence has failed so badly that the jury should not even have to go to deliberations. The judge granted Mr. Walsh’ motion and dismissed the case against his client!